similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to mbplusbeta.com

mbplusbeta - · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

編集出版組織体アセテート∥acetate

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

現代韓国朝鮮学会 | Association for Contemporary Korean Studies in Japan

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

阿久澤　騰　　　ストーリー思考のススメ

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

上原多香子のために

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anightflow.digital

あなたの読書タイプ診断 | Contrast Pages - 東京・日本橋の書店

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

animarudoubutu.net

トアルの五つの書

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

アンモ　ネットショップ

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anninnprog.info

なくしたものを探して〜とりあえずやってみました

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

あの村の謎・あの村の秘密 | 「あの村の謎・あの村の秘密」謎解き物語コンテスト　作品大募集！！-神河町・福崎町・市川町・猪名川町-

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

another-book.net

Another Book: Escape your filter bubble.

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anovaticman.net

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

anpanman1105.com

Happy life – さあ始めよう。

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

＠じぱんぐ

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

ask-support.com

Webサイト統合のお知らせ

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

あすこまっ！

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

asobod11138.com

きままにやりたい

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

asr-ishibashi.net

川崎の法律家・行政書士石橋のブログ

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

勉強すれば人生変わる

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.