Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mazmr.com

Taiki M. · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
acm.gg
ACM @ UIUC
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bluedotpod.com
Bluedot Pod - Have your own perspective.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
fananimi.com
Fanani M. Ihsan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
pipinoc.com
Personal Wiki -
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
aiki.io
aiki – scalable technologies
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
acttools.net
Your Wiki - ActTools
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
matiasolivera.com
Matías Olivera Freire
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
cliffixit.com
ClifFixIT Reloaded
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
inventivepixels.com
InventivePixels.com – Inventive Pixels
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
neuralvibes.com
Thoughtful | Neural Vibes
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
alecrodriguez.net
Alec Rodriguez — Designer & Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
aberwiki.org
Aberwiki | Open Source Wiki Platform
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
instigatecafe.com
Instigate Cafe | Engineering Collective
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
adityabalki.tech
Retro Portfolio | Product Designer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
djain.dev
Daksh Jain
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
intelovus.com
INTELOVUS
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
interactiveties.com
Interactive Ties
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
masonspeck.com
Mason Speck
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.