Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mazdak.com

Mazdak | Substack · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
theocrin.com
Teocrin | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
mavericohm.com
Maveric Ohm | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
intheir20s.com
inTheir20s | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
mayasuresh.com
Maya Suresh | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
insular.dev
Dull Systems | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
ariastocracy.com
ariastocracy | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
neuroticdevices.com
Neurotic Devices | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
faustomotter.com
Fausto Motter | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
armanmadani.com
Arman Madani | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
documentroot.com
erik’s Substack | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
theseniortechie.com
TheSeniorTechie | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
thesecuritytimes.com
Martin Szudarski | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
theolognion.com
The Olognion | Matthew Solenya | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
newnewis.com
The New New | Brent Turner | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
clientserver.dev
Client/Server | Jacob Voytko | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
growingweb3.com
Growing Web3 | James Ross | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
4good-finds.com
4-Good Finds | Abi Bouhmaida | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
abhishektiwari.org
Infinite Monkey | Abhishek Tiwari | Substack
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.