Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mayecon.com

Thomas J. May | CSU Fullerton · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
academicajournal.org
JEAC : Journal of Economic Academic
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
soenarjo.com
About | Aditya Soenarjo
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
ditraglia.com
Francis J. DiTraglia
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
new-economic-order.com
NEO - New Economic Order
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
mathiasjimenez.com
Mathias Jimenez
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
maximotorero.com
Maximo Torero – Our Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
rogercooper.com
rogercooper.com – My personal website and the World Historical Economic Database
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
theodorecaputi.com
Theodore L. Caputi — Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
dlagziel.com
David Lagziel | Lecturer | Economics & Game Theory
1 shared topicseconomy
64match
maxgillman.com
Max Gillman – Friedrich A. Hayek Professor of Economic History; Department of Economics; University of Missouri – St. Louis
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
matthieugomez.com
Matthieu Gomez | Columbia University
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
mayarafelix.com
Mayara Felix
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
alexandermackay.org
Alexander MacKay | Economics
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
maxbnorton.com
Max B. Norton | Economist | Senior Associate, CRA
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
maxnorton.com
Max B. Norton | Economist | Senior Associate, CRA
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
sofiewaltl.com
Sofie R Waltl – Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
nexuseconomist.com
perspectives for the perceptive – Perspectives for the perceptive
1 shared topicseconomy
63match
cambridgeahead.co.uk 🇬🇧
A voice for the Cambridge economy | Cambridge Ahead
1 shared topicseconomy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.