Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to maxspector.com

Max Spector – Design for people, products, and purpose · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
masstimod.com
MassTiMod – Design For Change
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
8anshiber.com
EITAN SHIBER – Product Design and Branding
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
invysion.com
Invysion – Product Design and Strategy
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
thepenguinstudios.com
Penguin Studios | Design for Products and Goods
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
rodrigomanfredi.com
Rodrigo Manfredi – Product Design Director
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
soheecha.com
Sohee Cha – Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
arisdotti.com
Aris Dotti – Product designer
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
robrogan.com
Rob Brogan – Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
rodeakash.com
Akash Rode – Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
dnamilano.com
DNA MILANO – Unique design products and projects from Italy.
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
themikedawson.com
Mike Dawson – Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
dnddesign-studio.com
dND – Design Studio
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
robinclediere.com
Robin Clediere – Design Director
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
theoddhatcreative.com
The Odd Hat Creative – Design for Every Shape and Style.
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
actdesign.org
ActDesign.Org – Design for graphic, digital, and interactive projects.
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
fatedcreativeagency.com
Fated Creative Agency – Design for different.
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
dnarang.com
Devanshu Narang – Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
farhadghaffari.com
Farhad Ghaffari – Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.