Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to maxpears.com

MaxPears – Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
ismapnieves.com
Ismael P. Nieves – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
anfex.com
Antonio Felaco – Designer & Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
rezahassani.com
Reza Hassani – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
richieberry.com
Richie Berry – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
bastianrandau.com
Bastian Randau – Level Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
garycooke.com
Gary Cooke – UX & Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
estebanfajardo.com
Esteban Fajardo – Design for fun
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
korbinwhiteside.com
Korbin Whiteside – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
ricardoliuportfolio.com
Ricardo Liu – Video Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
evagamedev.com
Evangelia Fahantidou – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
caitlinconroy.com
Caitlin L. Conroy – Lead Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
jacobaudick.com
Jacob Audick – Game Designer. Programmer.
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
disybell.com
Kuad – DARKSIDE
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
rickkole.com
Rick Kolesar / Game Designer – game designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
ko-games.com
KO – Games
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
resteiner.com
Ryan Steiner – Engineer – Designer – Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
a3games.com
A3GAMES – A3GAMES
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
andyheather.com
Andy Heather – Game Writer & Narrative Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.