Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to maxgfoster.com

Max G Foster – Author · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
thejoyofaveryseries.com
Rhonda Wagner – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
74match
kristabeucler.com
Krista Beucler – author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
bobbirise.com
Bobbi Rise – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
annahaines.net
Anna Haines – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
bobshepherdauthor.com
Bob Shepherd – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
thepowerofhisbread.com
FADI ARNAOUT – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
theromanticpreacher.com
The Romantic Preacher – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
gregwoodlandauthor.com
Greg Woodland – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
nicholeyates.com
Nichole Yates – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
clintlanier.com
Clint Lanier – Author, Professor
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
aninnocentworld.com
Douglas A. King – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
robertlongwood.com
Robert Longwood – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
sonianicholson.com
Sonia Nicholson – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
sonjadanielson.com
Sonja Danielson – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
nickenlowe.com
Nick Enlowe – Author Blog
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
pipsgivingseries.com
HOLLIE NOVELETSKY – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
robertotooleauthor.com
Robert O'Toole – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
kumailahmed.com
Kumail Ahmed – Author Website
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.