Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to maxfogdall.com

Max's Portfolio Website · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
matthewgh.com
Matt's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
farahabdi.com
Farah's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
73match
kscubestore.com
Sarik's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
73match
insiya-raja.com
Insiya's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
nicholasjsteiner.com
Nicholas Steiner's Portfolio Website | Nicholas Steiner
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
armaan-amazan.com
Armaan Amazan's portfolio site
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
alecotterson.dev
Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
romelolopez.com
Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
aronlenvig.com
Aron Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
ronald-luo.com
Ron's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
aaryaman.me
Aaryaman | Portfolio OS
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
adiunni.tech
Adiunni | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
ariiq.com
Ariiq — Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
maxshi.com
Max Shi - Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
rony-lee.com
Rony L. | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
adityabhatkar.dev
Aditya — Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
roancreed.com
Roan Creed Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
maximkim.dev
Maxim Kim | Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.