Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to maxfindel.com

Max F. Findel · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
faultfinder.com
FaultFinder
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
masonbacotti.com
masonbacotti
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
matheuspaiva.com
Matheus Paiva
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ksinder.com
Kenneth Sinder
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewlwatts.com
Andrew L Watts
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
arthurisyes.com
arthur murauskas
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
sochaaptak.com
Index -
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
rohannihalani.com
Rohan Nihalani
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
andrewhollenbach.com
andrew hollenbach
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
client-telemetry-hub.com
Home — Corvex Systems
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
client-cdn-prod.com
Home — Corvex Systems
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
ahangari.org
Amir Ahangari — engineer, founder, salsero
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
robbiesapunarich.com
Robbie Sapunarich
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
rmondello.com
Ricky Mondello
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
0xff.ai
0xff :: wayfinding at the boundary
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
nexusiqlive.com
Nexus IQ — Gate Automation Fault Finder
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
co-dash.com
Co-Dash · A dashboard tool that doesn't look like a dev tool
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
softwareiseasypeoplearehard.com
Home - Software is Easy, People are Hard
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.