Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to maxfarver.com

Max Farver | Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
alisaleem.cloud
Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
gricardov.com
My Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
sol-lee.dev
Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
nigelloh.com
Nigel Loh - Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
rocky-production.com
Brian Ruiz | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
pierrelapolla.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
maxhalfinportfolio.com
Max Halfin | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
alexandermckinney.org
My Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
l-we.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
masonliu.dev
Mason Liu | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
theovisagie.com
Theo Visagie | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
mattyoder.com
Matt Yoder | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
2trung.com
Trung Nguyen | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
coela.dev
Portfolio | S.T.R.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
aryanobrai.com
Ary's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
gsambabu.dev
Ghautham Sambabu | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
andrewwhitman.com
Andrew Whitman Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
74match
nigeldavis.com
Nigel Davis | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.