Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to maxbennett.dev

Max Bennett – Game Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
91match
mateigiurgiu.com
Matei Giurgiu – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
90match
cluttercloudgames.com
ClutterCloud Games – game developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
85match
faustlogic.com
Faust Logic – Indie Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
81match
5talesstudio.com
5 Tales Studio – Indie Video Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
81match
pinkarcana.dev
Pink Arcana | Indie game developer.
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
79match
pixelvoices.com
Pixel Voices - Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
79match
benjaminhardy.dev
Benjamin Hardy – Learning game development
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
77match
robwalch.com
Rob Walch | Web Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
bnguyenportfolio.com
Bryan Nguyen – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
arosioalberto.com
Alberto Arosio – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
maximtsai.com
Maxim Tsai - Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
76match
fayetyson.com
Faye Tyson – Game Production and Development
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
mathewpalumbo.com
Mathew Palumbo – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
famousaspect.com
FamousAspect - Game Development Explained
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
robertpercival.com
Robert Percival – Game Developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
mboultoureau.com
Mathis Boultoureau
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
rockysavoeung.com
Rocky Savoeung
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
adventale.net
Adventale – a game developer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.