Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to max-strang.com

Max Strang · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
alexstrand.dev
alex strand: digital garden
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
benjamin-stratton.com
Benjamin Stratton
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
pineapplecantina.com
3Plugin Strategies
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
andytran.dev
Andy Tran
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
alexstarosta.dev
Alex Starosta
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
armanitran.com
Armani Tran Ung
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
lamberski.com
Maciek Lamberski
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
arrangeactassert.com
Arrange Act Assert
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
abstractsummit.com
Abstract Summit 2024
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
softwarenotstress.com
Software, not stress.
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
abstractprojectfactory.com
Abstract Project Factory
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
adrianfletcher.org
An Australian Techie in London
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
solunyx.com
FlexStart Bootstrap Template - Index
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
codingworkx.com
Digital Transformation Services Company
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
felltech.com
Bootslander Bootstrap Template - Index
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
greyspades.com
GreySpades - Transforming Digital Experiences
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
abstractionjackson.com
Jackson Galan, Software Engineer | abstractionjackson
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
ale.dev
Alejandro Krumkamp - Project Leader & Full Stack Web developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.