Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to max-markus.com

Startseite - Max Markus · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
oliversautor.de 🇩🇪
Startseite
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
siegfried-berger-stiftung.de 🇩🇪
Startseite
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
spiel-und-autor.de 🇩🇪
Startseite
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
thiele-verlag.com
Startseite - Thiele Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
thieleverlag.com
Startseite - Thiele Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
semesterbooks.de 🇩🇪
Startseite - Semester Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
spiel-und-sprache.de 🇩🇪
Startseite - Spiel und Sprache
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
innerearchitektur.com
Startseite - Innere Architektur
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
parkbooks.de 🇩🇪
Startseite | Park Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
park-books.de 🇩🇪
Startseite | Park Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
biblioscout.net
Startseite | BiblioScout
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
gruenekraft.com
Startseite | Grüne Kraft
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
siegel7.de 🇩🇪
Siegel7 - Startseite
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
fairybooks.com
Startseite – Fairy Books
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
analogika.info
Analogika - Startseite
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
neumanncreative.com
NeumannCreative - Startseite
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
prolix-zeitung.de 🇩🇪
wodsch.de :: Startseite
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
prolix-online.de 🇩🇪
wodsch.de :: Startseite
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.