Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mawnet.com

MAW Software Ltd. · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
xesoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Xe Software Ltd
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
dmcelevation.com
ESM Software Ltd
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
esmsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
ESM Software Ltd
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
dotsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Dot Software Ltd
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
dkl-software.co.uk 🇬🇧
DKL Software Ltd
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
ilmsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
ILM Software LTD
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
kyrosweb.com
Kyros Software Ltd.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
3yay.net
3YAY SOFTWARE LTD
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
coeussoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Coeus Software Ltd
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
tadpolesoftware.ie 🇮🇪
Tadpole Software Ltd.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
2paw.com
2paw Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
epsilonsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Epsilon Software Ltd
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
menapiasoftware.ie 🇮🇪
Menapia Software Ltd
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
bobcaygeonsoft.com
Bobcaygeon Software Ltd.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
millerchipsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Millerchip Software Ltd.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
fastpath-software.com
Fastpath Software Ltd
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
76match
bluebeansoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Bluebean software Ltd
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
75match
gtwsoftware.com
GTW Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.