Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mawburn.com

Matt Burnett | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
rjlaasish.com
Aasish Rijal | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
82match
pierres.dev
Pierre Smith | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
81match
ankitapatil.dev
Ankita Patil | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
alexcali.me
Alex Cali | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
abhinavranjith.dev
Abhinav Ranjith | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
isaacantwi.com
Isaac Antwi | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
andybangs.dev
Andy Bangs | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
angusblomley.com
Angus Blomley - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
nicoceron.com
Nico Ceron | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
codecret.com
Mohamad | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
greglafauci.com
Greg LaFauci | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
fernicolas.dev
Fer Nicolás | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
roselle.dev
Roselle Tabuena | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
billygrossman.com
Billy Grossman | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
divyanshusoni.com
Divyanshu Soni | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
alexiwisteria.dev
Alex Lee | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
donbellamy.com
Don Bellamy | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
pirooz.dev
Pirooz Ekhtiyari | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.