Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mavisoptics.com

Mavis – Optics · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
andyfiord.me
About me – Andy Fiord
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
67match
bluestarplanetorium.com
Bluestar – Planetorium
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
bgandersson.com
B-G Andersson – Astronomer
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
bgandersson.net
B-G Andersson – Astronomer
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
1calendar.io
Agenda 1Calendar.io – 1☾
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
aicacv.org
AICAC V – November 9 -15, 2025
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
akronauts.org
Akronauts – From the City of Innovation
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
kupsat.com
KUPSAT – Small Sats & Cube Sats
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
picassonaut.com
Picassonaut – adventure in space
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
a-7.org
Big Star – The Secret space Laser
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
1norton.com
Chuck Norton – Citizen of the World
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
66match
rocketgab.com
RocketGab – Space News and Analysis
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
65match
groupstella.com
Group Stella – The Interstellar blog
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
65match
alanfitzsimmons.com
Professor Alan Fitzsimmons – One rock/iceball at a time
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
65match
theklew.com
the klew – leading nowhere since 1996
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
65match
andy2016.com
Andrew D. Basiago – One Man in the Name of Truth
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
65match
sevensystems.uk 🇬🇧
The Seven Systems – The writing of Graydon Jones
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy
65match
arizonaufos.com
Sedona UFOs – The Unusual with Michael O'Sedona
1 shared topicsspace-and-astronomy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.