Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to maviskemo.com

Mavis Kemo – Follow me through Dimensions · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
thepaperforest.com
The Paper Forest – Wander with me through a forest filled with books.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
adamthomas.net
Adam Thomas, Author – Finding Truth Through Fantasy.
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
anneberlyandrews.com
Anneberly Andrews – – Creating and Stimulating My World through Pure Imagination –
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
romosreadingroom.com
K.L. Romo – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
djdavisauthor.com
DJ Davis – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
fbegum.com
Fawzia Begum – Fictions and more
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
dlharris.com
Racing Through Time | Enter the Hangar
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
theresetungen.com
Therese Tungen – Forfattar
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
dldotbailey.com
D.L. Bailey – Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
farragobooks.com
Home – Farrago Books
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
dlanesharp.com
D. Lane Sharp – writer
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
kristinasuko.com
Kristina Suko – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
arnaudpascolo.com
Arnaud Pascolo – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
robertobustillo.com
Roberto Bustillo – Autor
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
ahmedmirza.net
Mirza – Thoughts, insights, moments
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
gregprado.com
Greg Prado – Book Author
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
maviscrooms.com
Mavis Gail Crooms – You only thought you knew the story
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
anngeretysmyth.com
Ann Gerety Smyth – Irish Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.