Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to matyasfodor.com

Matyas Fodor Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
rohangore.com
Rohan Gore - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
donbellamy.com
Don Bellamy | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
codecret.com
Mohamad | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
dminhvu.com
Minh Vu — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
pikaard.com
Bryan | Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
rizkyzhang.com
Home | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
mayurzala.com
Mayur Zala - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andybangs.dev
Andy Bangs | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
iordneto.com
Iord Neto — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andrewbadams.com
Andrew Adams | Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
bmendo.dev
Brian Mendoza, Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
arnointech.com
Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
kylekerlew.com
Kyle Kerlew | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ahmedyassin.dev
Ahmed Yassin | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
rodrigopsasaki.com
Rodrigo Sasaki - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
divyanshusoni.com
Divyanshu Soni | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
felixrowen.com
Felix Rowen | Fullstack Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
matramona.com
Mat Ramona - Fullstack Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.