Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mattstir.com

Matthew Stirnweiss – Personal Blog · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
mattoftheyear.com
Matt Strenk
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
doedja.com
doedja.
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
66match
7lrc.com
7LRC Blog: Insights on Technology, Lifestyle, and Personal Growth
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
andy-kim2000.dev
Andy Kim's Personal Website
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
gregzimm.com
GREGZIMM | Personal Digital Play Area
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
65match
matthewmichelotti.com
Matthew Michelotti
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
ionutshiro.com
Ionut Shiro – Content Creator
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
news-minute.com
NewsGeek – Tech, Geek & Buzz News
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
news-geek.com
NewsGeek – Tech, Geek & Buzz News
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
pholectify.com
Pholectify – We create, You create.
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
nexusduos.com
Nexusduos – Breaking News in Technology & Stratup
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
64match
3itechnology.net
3itechnology.net – Innovate with 3i Technology
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
63match
gsoenn.com
Gregor Sönnichsen – Story Tech Programming Portfolio
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
63match
iopanelpodcast.com
[ I/O Panel ] – We talk about tech and other really random stuff. -James
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
63match
news-fo.com
News Fo – Breaking news, technology, science, culture, and business updates.
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
62match
softwarestrahan.com
Andrew Strahan
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
62match
fastman92.com
Home - fastman92 blog
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming
62match
neumueller.dev
Thomas' tech blog
2 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.