Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mattstechprojects.com

Matt's Tech Projects · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
2pif.com
2πf: blog and tech projects
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
maudevx.com
Projects
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
arrowprojects.com
ArrowProjects
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
cnoda.dev
Collyn Noda's Projects
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
thesaturdayprojects.com
TheSaturdayProjects
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
a-spn.com
Alan Stephan's Tech Playground | Web Development Projects & Tools
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
theofargeas.com
@theofrgs project vault
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
abstractprojectfactory.com
Abstract Project Factory
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
adamfarrell.org
Adam Farrell's Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
aardbol.dev
Projects — aardbol.dev
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
robaine.com
Your project, my expertise
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
theprojectmassive.com
Project Massive -
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
123piano.com
Philippe Jadin – Notes & projects
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
thesampsonproject.com
About Me | The Sampson Project
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
aaronstatue.org
The Aaron Swartz Statue Project
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
beehiveforum.net
Project Beehive Forum
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
robkremers.com
Rob Kremers - Project Directory
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
100projects.dev
100Projects - Project Ideas for Developers
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.