Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mattpker.com

Matt Atkinson · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
matthaddon.com
Matt Haddon
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
mattlayman.com
Matt Layman
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
mattnakama.com
Matt Nakama
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
mattpruitt.com
Matt Pruitt
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
alaminsobuj.net
alaminsobuj
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
mattmakai.com
Matt Makai dot com
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
alexandralim.dev
Alexandra Lim | Front End Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
aronberezkin.com
About - Aron Berezkin
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
mattdoescode.com
Home | Matt Does Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ankitchouhan.dev
Home • Ankit Chouhan
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ioannisvossos.com
Ioannis Vossos - Junior Backend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
arnoud.dev
Arnoud de Vries
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
matheusmazeto.com
A blog by Matheus Mazeto
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
thejonlee.com
Jonathan Lee
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
matthewdebeer.com
Matthew de Beer - Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
bobanstojanovski.com
Boban's Coding Asylum
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
codingian.com
Ian’s blog | A personal blog exploring web development, coding tutorials, and learning notes
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
farazkaleemmalik.com
Faraz Kaleem Malik | Personal website for a Computer Science student at UofT
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.