Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mattpetts.com

Matt Petts | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
ronydev.com
Rony Silva | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
arielfj.com
Ariel Fermín | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
arthursena.com
sena | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
favourakpasi.com
Favour Akpasi | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
ropdias.dev
Rodrigo P. Dias | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
benrogers.dev
Ben Rogers | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
bobbyagnese.com
Bobby Agnese | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
dnhen.com
dnhen | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
guerrajavierswe.com
Portfolio | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
alfredojahn.dev
Alfredo Jahn | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
matiasrotondo.com
John Doe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
boamorte.dev
Esteban Salazar | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
codecastillo.com
Daniel Castillo | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
mashoado.com
Masho Ado | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
adrianlara.org
Adrian Lara | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
rjcodes.dev
Lee Ren Jie | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
abhisheksharma.me
Abhishek Sharma | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
mattj.com
Matthew James: Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.