Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mattj.com

Matthew James: Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
matthewgoodson.com
Matthew Goodson - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
mattpetts.com
Matt Petts | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
matthewenewman.com
Matthew Newman - Frontend Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
dnhen.com
dnhen | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
benrogers.dev
Ben Rogers | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
guerrajavierswe.com
Portfolio | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
arthursena.com
sena | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
nezih.dev
Nezih | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
alfredojahn.dev
Alfredo Jahn | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ableez.cloud
Ahmed Abdullahi - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andriyn.tech
Andri Yani - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
3raul.com
Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
felipenava.dev
Felipe Nava — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ronydev.com
Rony Silva | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
bobbyagnese.com
Bobby Agnese | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
kwonjustin.com
Justin Kwon | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
neturu.com
Website of a software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andynewman.dev
Andy Newman - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.