similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to matthajda.com

Matt Hajda · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

mattandreko.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

mattrideout.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

matthewrideout.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Matt Sesi - Link in Bio

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

cybermatters.co.uk 🇬🇧

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

armankolozyan.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

matthewneeper.com

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

theskeenadvantage.com

Matt Skeen — The Skeen Advantage

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Home - Matter-ID

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

mattaaronjames.com

Matt James - Cybersecurity Professional

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Matt Linton | Security & Incident Response

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

inspirationalsecurity.com

Matt Palmer — Cyber resilience, assurance, governance

1 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.