Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to matthaddon.com

Matt Haddon · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
mattpker.com
Matt Atkinson
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
mattmik.com
Matthew Mikolay
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
mattlayman.com
Matt Layman
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
mattpruitt.com
Matt Pruitt
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
mattnakama.com
Matt Nakama
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
mattmakai.com
Matt Makai dot com
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
alexischavez.io
Alexis Chávez - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
adamyeats.dev
Adam Yeats | adamyeats.dev
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
abhid.me
Abhishek Dadwal | Backend Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
armaizadenwala.com
Software Engineer Portfolio - JS, Python, Ruby | Armaiz
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
arielgerstein.com
Ariel Gerstein | Javascript developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
mattdoescode.com
Home | Matt Does Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
adhywiranata.com
Adhy Wiranata - Front-End Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
adityatote.tech
Aditya Tote | Backend Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
bharathnuthalapati.dev
Bharath Kumar Nuthalapati
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
abdiaz.com
Ariel Diaz - Backend Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
0xshey.com
Shey Laplanche
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
fatihakdogan.com
Fatih Akdoğan | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.