Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mattfarina.com

Matt Farina · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
that-matt.com
Matt Button
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
imarijoyborda.com
Imari Joy C. Borda
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
kharrl.com
Matt Kharrl
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alex-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alexander-schimpf.com
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alexschimpf.dev
Alexander Schimpf - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alxd.dev
Alexandre Vicenzi
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
arrontaylor.me
Arron Taylor
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
adityamohta.dev
Kumar Aditya Mohta
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
adrianmiles.io
Adrian Miles - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
andrewhxue.com
Andrew Xue
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
andreasellwanger.com
Andreas Ellwanger
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
derekdemuro.com
Derek Demuro
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
evanm.dev
Evan McIntire
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
igorsaranchuk.com
Igor Saranchuk
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
kfelter.com
Kyle Felter's Blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
mancini.io
Christopher Mancini | Problem Solver Who Writes Code
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
albertp.dev
Albert Portnoy
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.