Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to matteobreda.com

Matteo Breda Game Design · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
bnguyenportfolio.com
Bryan Nguyen – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
rkleyn.com
Ramana Kleyn - Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
75match
arosioalberto.com
Alberto Arosio – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
kungfusquirrel.com
Andrew Weldon: Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
grusso94.com
Giacomo Russo | Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
73match
arthurperalta.com
Arthur Peralta – Portfolio – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
theoryoffun.com
A Theory of Fun for Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
benstewartgames.com
Ben Stewart – Game Designer and Scripter
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
mateuszfigura.com
Mateusz Figura | Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
gregoiredesign.com
Jonathan Gregoire - Game Design - Home
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
cameronconnick.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cameron Connick | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
iprajwal.com
Prajwal Pandey – Technical Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
kunalhanda.com
Game Design | Kunal Handa
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
maxstucker.com
Max Stucker Game Design - Home
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
arielleshander.com
Arielle Shander – Game Designer and IT Professional
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
arrowplaygamedesign.com
Home - Arrowplay Game Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
solglaive.com
Brandon Smith – Game Designer and Gameplay Programmer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
robmsantos.com
Rob M Santos - Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.