similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to matsick.com

Caleb Matsick | Home · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

nexixsoftware.com

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

matthewoneil.com

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

3CORESec | Home

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

BloxBound - Home

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Home | HackinAhab

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Home | Kybernetik

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Home | HackinAhab

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Artur Cygan - Home

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

robjhen's homepage

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

softwaremajor.com

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Jim Roskind's Home Page

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

binarywhales.com

[binary whales] Matteo Campanelli’s Home Page

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

IPŘAct — Home - IPŘAct

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

thevdilockdownguide.com

Launch Home - Avada Launch

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

alex-ulmer.info

Alex Ulmer - Personal Homepage

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.