Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to matsemann.com

Matsemann (Mats Krüger Svensson) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
aaix.dev
aaix (aidan) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
matzhilven.com
MatzHilven (Matz Hilven) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
ashfn.dev
ashfn (Asher Falcon) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
akamike.net
akamike (Mike Robinson) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
amnesia0287.dev
amnesia0287 (Jason) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
aaronandrewkhan.com
akhan727 (Aaron) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
aericson.me
aericson (André Ericson) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
dobsonj.com
dobsonj (Jonathan Dobson) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
80match
toptier.dev
paperboyo (Mateusz) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
airstrafe.net
a8f (Alex) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
bludoo.dev
Bludoo (Owen) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
ajoo.dev
Ajoo (João Bravo) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
romansavin.com
rsavin (Roman Savin) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
brandongulla.com
bgulla (Brandon) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
a-jd.dev
a-jd (AJ Dave) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
booleandynamics.com
breandan (breandan) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
faqeel.dev
faqeel (Fares) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
alecv.tech
alecvdp (Alec) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.