Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to matotan.dev

matotan_blog · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
pitayan.com
Pitayan Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
pixcoders.com
Rafal Spacjer blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
kylejeske.com
Bit by Bit | A blog about coding, technology, and software development.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
greyblake.com
Posts | Serhii Potapov (greyblake)
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
djunebar.com
Djunebar
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
kurtzhao.com
Kurt's Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
matecdev.com
MatecDev | Mathematics, Technology, and Software Development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
mbuege.com
Matthias Büge
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
agingdeveloper.net
The Aging Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andriikushch.com
Andrii Kushch Blog | Insights and experiences in software development and programming, shared by Andrii Kushch on his personal blog..
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
6nok.org
Fatih's Personal Blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
dkasa.dev
David Kasakaitis
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
agilecoder.org
AgileCoder.net
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
doesnotexistyet.com
~/blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ariogrey.com
Ario Afrashteh
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
docodethatmatters.com
Do Code That Matters
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
alexlazcano.dev
Alex Lazcano
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
andrewemerson.io
Andrew Emerson
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.