Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mathiassen.dev

Marcus Mathiassen · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
mathiashove.com
Mathias Hove
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
matse.dev
hi I'm Matthias :)
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
matthiashager.com
Matthias Hager
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
mbuege.com
Matthias Büge
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
matheussalinas.com
Works on Matheus’s Machine
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
matheododi.com
Home | Matheo Dodi
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
matheusportela.com
About · Matheus Portela
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
mathewrolf.com
Mathew Rolf
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
matthiaszarzecki.com
Matthias Zarzecki | iOS Development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
mattmerr.com
Index | MattMerr
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
mateusmelo.com
Hi, and welcome to my website! - Mateus Melo
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
mathlive.io
Scientific Computing for Everyone · MathLive
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
admidori.net
Aoi Kondo / admidori
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
docodethatmatters.com
Do Code That Matters
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
matseslats.com
Portfolio Mats Haugerud
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
boessena.com
Andrew Boessen Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
cmaytom.com
Chris Maytom | Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
ku1ik.com
Marcin Kulik | ku1ik.com
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.