Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to matheusk.dev

code-server login · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
rokanmitra.com
code-server login
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
85match
solfisher.com
code-server login
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
gtcoder.com
Coder
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
intelephense.com
Intelephense: The PHP Language Server
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
4coder.net
4coder
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
math2code.com
Math2Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
rootcodebd.com
Root Code
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
softcodelab.com
SoftCodeLab
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
interprolog.com
InterProlog Consulting | Logic for your app
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
divcoderender.com
DIVinity | Code Visualizer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
binify.dev
Binify - Modern Code Pastebin
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
admi.tech
admi.tech | Python Services
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
cmdbuf.com
Command Buffers - Automation as code
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
grugcode.com
Grug Code - Simple Rock For Make Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
fapilog.dev
Fapilog — Async-First Logging for Python
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
gtjusila.com
Gennesaret Tjusila | Student, Writer, Coder.
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
binlog.org
Binlog — a high performance log library for C++
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
61match
9xcodes.com
9xCodes - Solve your coding problems in 9x speed!
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.