Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to matheka.dev

Software Developer Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
bhanucharank.dev
Bhanu Charan K | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
bnhsoftware.dev
Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
abhishekrazy.com
Abhishek Razy | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
akshayk.dev
Akshay Kalathil | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
arnewinter.dev
Arne Winter | Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
77match
rlteixeira.com
Rafael Teixeira - Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
arnavsagar.dev
Arnav Sagar Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
billydavis.dev
Billy Davis — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
mattoliver.dev
Matt Oliver Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
andrewbeaver.dev
Andrew Beaver | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
codemiru.com
Amir — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
cloudydestiny.com
Electro Cloud | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
76match
albert-gonzalez.dev
Albert González - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
76match
ronenjain.com
Ronen Jain | Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
75match
arnointech.com
Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
rohitgaur.dev
Rohit Gaur | Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
romitgabani.com
Romit Gabani // Full-Stack Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
bolacha.dev
Bolacha.dev — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.