Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mateomancera.com

Mateo Mancera — Level Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
nicholaschabot.com
Nicholas Chabot — Level Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
74match
inversionchamber.com
Level Design
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
72match
theodorehilhorst.com
Theodore Hilhorst – Level designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
arjunkurapati.com
Kurapati Arjun – Game & Level Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
71match
benstoddard.com
Ben Stoddard - Level Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
bradleycdawn.com
BRADLEY DAWN - LEVEL DESIGNER - Home
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
nick3d.com
NICK KEITH – Senior Level Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
maxpkenny.com
Max Kenny | Game Designer, Level Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
alexisarenas.net
Alexis Arenas - Game & Level Designer Portfolio | Alexis Arenas
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
maxtishakov.com
Max Tishakov – Game and level designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
toprakdemircan.com
Toprak Demircan – Game & Level Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
matthulse.com
Matt Hulse | Level Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
alexscrivner.com
Alex Scrivner — Game Designer & Artist
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
andreypvelkov.com
Andrey Velkov — Lead Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
rkleyn.com
Ramana Kleyn - Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
cameronconnick.co.uk 🇬🇧
Cameron Connick | Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
bnguyenportfolio.com
Bryan Nguyen – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
67match
arosioalberto.com
Alberto Arosio – Game Designer
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.