similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to mateocabeza.com

– · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

sirandalibros.mx 🇲🇽

Siranda – Libros

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Landing – Riomorfo

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

PG Escuder – Literatura

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

arquitonica.com

Arquitónica – Editorial

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

GRATEL PERU – GRATEL BLOG

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Alabazan – Narración oral

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Peschwin – La vida de Pedro

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

sindromedestickler.es 🇪🇸

Alberto Pino – Alberto Pino

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

thesecret.es 🇪🇸

The Secret.es® – El Secreto

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

libreriabonilla.com.mx 🇲🇽

Libreria Bonilla – Dede 1950

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

1 Página – Blog sobre libros

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

3 pies – Revista de Literatura

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Río libros – Librería virtual

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

berg-institute.org

Berg Institute – Derechos Humanos

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

alejandropino.net

Alejandro Pinø – -blog del autor-

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

arlettealmanzar.com

Arlette Almanzar – Arlette Almanzar

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Mar Toscano – Periodista. Escritora

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

Nettronik – Soluciones electronicas

1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.