Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mateiv.com

Máté Iványi - Product Strategist and UX Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
roeedoron.com
Roee Doron - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
megmoy.com
Meagan Moy — Product & UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
romainviard.com
Romain Viard - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
robertipsihi.com
Robert Ipsihi | Product Designer & UX Strategist
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
robhammett.com
Rob Hammett - Product & UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
nevinvo.com
Nevin Vo - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
mehdiandme.com
Mehdi Mirzaie | Digital Product Designer & Product Strategist
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
rohitkr.com
Rohit Kumar - UI/UX Designer | Fintech, Branding & Product Strategy
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
niharkapadiya.com
Nihar Kapadiya | UI/UX Designer & Digital Strategist
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
robertorguezgijon.com
Roberto RG - Product designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
kushbothra.com
Kush Bothra - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
gregbilyk.com
Greg Bilyk — Product & UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
nicobanados.com
Nico Banados - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
nihalnova.com
Nihal Singh - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
theonordahl.com
Theo Perez Nordahl - Product designer and developer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
adam-anything.com
Adam Ashley · Product & UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
mathieuserrano.com
Mathieu Serrano - Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
alexgf.dev
Àlex GF | UI/UX & Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.