Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to matchbox-dc.com

Matchbox DC – Matching Packaging Design and Production · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
faorodesign.com
sixfoot-four – product design & strategy
1 shared topicsdesign
66match
baswallet.nl 🇳🇱
Bas Wallet – Dutch Design Dinosaur
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
rogerplus.com
ROGER+ – Branding, Concept & Design
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
4zfactory.com
4zFactory – tuning and styling
1 shared topicsdesign
65match
beofriends.nl 🇳🇱
BeoFriends – Bang & Olufsen | Danish Design
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
bbb-design.nl 🇳🇱
BBBdesign BBB-design Roel van den Broek Teamplast Silvo Keune packaging closure
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
4styling.com
4 Styling – Hulp bij styling keuzes!
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
andreagobel.nl 🇳🇱
Andrea Göbel - Andrea Göbel Art Direction and Design
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
ads-74.com
ADS74 Architecture – Architecture as Art. Visionary by Design.
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
2meesters.com
ShortO – ShortO
1 shared topicsdesign
64match
planduparc.com
Plattegronden – Snibbit
1 shared topicsdesign
63match
roekoe.com
Roekoe - Creative Design Solution
1 shared topicsdesign
63match
allaboutdata.science
allaboutdata.science – Gewoon een of andere WordPress website
1 shared topicsdesign
63match
robinkeim.com
Robin Keim – Portfolio Website
1 shared topicsdesign
63match
boandesign.com
Boan Design
1 shared topicsdesign
63match
bartcode.nl 🇳🇱
Bartcode – Studio voor grafisch werk
1 shared topicsdesign
63match
a-cramer.com
AC | Architecture – Architect Amsterdam
1 shared topicsdesign
63match
bluekoe.com
BlueKoe – Grafisch ontwerp & vormgeving
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.