Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mataroll.com

Matar Roll - QA Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
achchu.net
Achchu - Senior QA Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
grindengineer.com
Grind Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
thepixelengineer.com
The Pixel Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kyleprouty.com
prouty.io | Data Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
ackerworx.dev
AckerWorx Engineering
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
nezubn.com
An Engineer's Musings
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
belonginc.dev
Belong Engineering Hub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
matthowell.com
Matt Howell | Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ksorv.com
Saurav Kumar | Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
fayimora.com
Fayi | Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
fayimora.io
Fayi | Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
aguerrevere.dev
Aaron | Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
softwareengineerportfolio.com
Ryan | Full-stack Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
softwareengineeringdaily.com
Software Engineering Daily
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
andrewkayvanfar.com
Andrew Kayvanfar | Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ankitdhall.dev
Ankit Dhall · Data Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
argonautengineering.com
Argonaut Engineering - Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
piotrrojek.io
Piotr Rojek — Principal Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.