Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to masselis.com

VincentMasselis (Vincent Masselis) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
matigakis.com
pmatigakis (Matigakis Panagiotis) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
faqeel.dev
faqeel (Fares) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
dombean.com
dombean · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
79match
inverseinnovations.com
apocist (Opal Davis) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
airstrafe.net
a8f (Alex) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
79match
niapoor.com
niapoor (Nia Poor) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
aaix.dev
aaix (aidan) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
a-jd.dev
a-jd (AJ Dave) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
romanambroselli.com
r0m4n (Roman Ambroselli) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
actual.software
nirholas (nich) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
bignext.ai
bigmusic (BiG) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
instanceflow.com
dimitaracev · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
inueni.com
Inueni · GitHub
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
pinat.dev
aPinat (aPinat) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
rokit.dev
trey-k · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
laralabs.uk 🇬🇧
Laralabs · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
ageyev.biz
ageyev (Viktor Ageyev) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
78match
ajoo.dev
Ajoo (João Bravo) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.