Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to marschalek.com

Marschalek Architekten · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
armigru.com
START | ARMIGRU Architekten
3 shared topicsdesign
73match
kugel-architekten.com
Kugel Architekten, Stuttgart
3 shared topicsdesign
72match
thalmair-huber.de 🇩🇪
KPT ARCHITEKTEN - START
3 shared topicsdesign
72match
osaplus.de 🇩🇪
News, OSA Ochs Schmidhuber Architekten
3 shared topicsdesign
71match
rwa-test.de 🇩🇪
rother weykopf architekten
3 shared topicsdesign
70match
a-arch.com
Amann Architektur |
3 shared topicsdesign
70match
siegler-terranova.de 🇩🇪
Siegler & Terranova Architekten
3 shared topicsdesign
69match
team2architekten.de 🇩🇪
Team2+ – Architekten Partnerschaft mbB
3 shared topicsdesign
69match
berndkniess.net
bernd kniess architekten stadtplaner
3 shared topicsdesign
69match
prolog-architektur.de 🇩🇪
Prolog – Büro für Architekturprojekte
3 shared topicsdesign
67match
studio-cr.de 🇩🇪
Individuelle Architekturleistungen für Ihr Projekt
3 shared topicsdesign
67match
splus-bonn.de 🇩🇪
Architektur | Schroeder + Schevardo | Nordrhein-Westfalen
3 shared topicsdesign
66match
theissen-architektur.de 🇩🇪
THEISSEN architektur Architekturbüro Theissen: THEISSEN architektur
3 shared topicsdesign
65match
profaceprofiles.de 🇩🇪
Proface Gevelprofielen - Architect
3 shared topicsdesign
64match
orth-projektentwicklung.de 🇩🇪
orthprojektentwicklung
3 shared topicsdesign
63match
baumschlagerhutter.com
Baumschlager Hutter Partners - Baumschlager Hutter Partners
3 shared topicsdesign
63match
baumschlager-hutter-partners.com
Baumschlager Hutter Partners - Baumschlager Hutter Partners
3 shared topicsdesign
62match
argeton.com
Fassadensysteme
3 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.