Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to markwooding.com

Mark James Wooding · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
averyjameskingauthor.com
Avery James King
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
euravox.com
Lulu James Spencer
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
khjames.com
KH James | Substack
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
makaylajamesbooks.com
Makayla James Books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
reneejamesbooks.com
Renée James – Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
paulgordonjames.com
Paul Gordon James
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
malinjames.com
Home - Malin James
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
pcjamesauthor.com
PC James - Author of Cozy Mysteries
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
angelajameson.com
Angela Jameson – Writer
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
tesjamebraj.com
TesjamebraJ Home
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
kimberleywoodhouse.com
Kimberley Woodhouse
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
kimandkaylawoodhouse.com
Kimberley Woodhouse
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
kimwoodhouse.com
Kimberley Woodhouse
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
kingjamesnovel.com
King James (a novel in progress) – Work in progress
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
paulinawoods.com
Author Paulina Woods
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
abbiewoodbridgeauthor.com
Abbie Woodbridge Author
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
ifunnybooks.com
James Patterson – Books – I Funny | James Patterson Kids
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
ifunnybook.com
James Patterson – Books – I Funny | James Patterson Kids
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.