Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to markusmasip.com

Markus Masip - Medveten andning · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
62match
inomossborlakningen.com
INRE RESA
2 shared topicsholistic-health
61match
beyondhwco.com
Beyond - Holistic Wellness
2 shared topicsholistic-health
60match
andrum.net
ANDRUM
2 shared topicsholistic-health
60match
100procent.me
100%
2 shared topicswellness
32match
martaredeicoach.com
Hem | Rédei Márta Coach
1 shared topicswellness
32match
bloomaligned.com
Evelyn Hunn – Livscoach & mentor för kvinnor | Bloom Aligned
1 shared topicswellness
32match
astrea-longevity.com
Astrea Longevity | Ljusteknologi för långsiktig hälsa
1 shared topicswellness
32match
coachingmedken.com
Coaching med Ken | Hållbar styrka för högfungerande människor
1 shared topicswellness
31match
personallifelog.com
LifeLog – track mood, sleep and stress over time
1 shared topicswellness
30match
arkhult.com
Hem | Björn Arkhult
1 shared topicswellness
30match
maroj.com
MaRoJ här bor vi
1 shared topicswellness
24match
asyaconsulting.com
ASYA Consulting | holistisk coachning
1 shared topicsholistic-health
22match
ninachaska.com
Nina chaska healing
1 shared topicsholistic-health
22match
aromahalsa.com
Aroma Hälsa
1 shared topicsalternative-medicine
22match
greatbeing.com
Hem | GreatBeing - God hälsa hela vägen
1 shared topicsholistic-health
21match
asarudnaslax.com
Startsida - Åsa Rudnäs-Lax
1 shared topicsholistic-health
21match
andeanwellnesscenter.com
Andean Wellness Center
1 shared topicswellness
21match
coach4lifesweden.com
Coach4Life Sweden | Kroppsbehandling, Träning & Coaching
1 shared topicsfitness-and-exercise

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.