Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to markbabatunde.com

Mark Babatunde · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
andrewtorkbaker.com
Andrew Tork Baker
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
devsdevera.com
Mark IV
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ashdown.me
Mark Ashdown
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
kihumba.com
Mark Allan | kihumba.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
arnavsingh.net
Arnav Singh — Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
imdavidsg.com
Hi, I'm David
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
khoivan.dev
Khoi Van | Khoi Van - Android Developer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
nathanalkurdi.com
nathanalkurdi | Linktree
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
derekxwang.com
Derek X Wang - Software engineer, maker, and founder
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
dev-rondo.com
Rondo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
nabilmansour.com
Nabil Mansour's Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
paulabimana.com
Paul Abimana | Software Engineer & Product Leader
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
simonkaran.com
Simon Karan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewowest.com
Andrew West
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andrewlb.com
andrewlb | design and writing
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
developerinfra.com
Mark A. Wilson
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
devdiscipline.com
DevDiscipline — Software · Discipline · Futurism
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
terzi.dev
Federico Terzi - A Software Engineering Journey
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.