Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to markaustin.dev

Mark Austin | Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
kodeman.dev
Kodeman | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
diogodev.com
Diogo Duarte | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
mackcore.io
Mack Core | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
angellaqian.com
AQ | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
montesariel.com
Ariel Montes | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
reza-ghaleh.com
Reza Ghaleh | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
diparth.com
Diparth Patel | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ivangarzon.dev
Ivan Carron | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
angelcalderaro.com
Angel Calderaro | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
beaujorgensen.com
Beau Jorgensen | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
reynersubrata.com
Reyner Subrata | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ivankapunac.com
Ivan Kapunac | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
swarajnalwade.com
Swaraj Nalwade | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
cakenes.com
Cakenes - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
korinleck.com
Korin Leck | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
isfafad.dev
Isfa Fadil Muhammad | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ricabaguhin.com
Rica — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
gileadodo.com
Gilead Odo — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.