Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to marcodignazio.com

Marco DIgnazio | Industrial Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
78match
annu.me
Annuai | Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
78match
chloerenaepi.com
Chloe Pi | INDUSTRIAL DESIGNER
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
demetbilici.com
Demet Bilici | Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
design-um.com
DesignUM - Industrial Design
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
makeremcakir.com
M. A. Kerem Çakır - Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
kirmoos.com
Kirill Moosienko — Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
gmuzz.com
Griffin Muzzarelli – Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
natalieschaake.com
Natalie Schaake • Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
manonlesant.com
Manon Le Sant - industrial designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
tgdesignstudio.com
Tiger Chong Sheng Guo | Industrial Design
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
estevanquintanilla.com
Estevan Quintanilla (Industrial Designer)
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
designresolute.com
Eli Hooper // Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
nahuelvillar.com
Nahuel Villar. Industrial Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
betadesignoffice.com
Home | Beta Design Office | London Industrial Designers
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
et-cor.com
COR | Visual, Physical & Industrial Design
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
andrewfdunne.com
Andrew Dunne Industrial Design
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
derelshell.com
Derel Shell - Industrial Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
amrnaga.com
Amr Naga - Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.