Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to marcbg.com

Marc BG's Portfolio of Design in Videogames · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
demirdemirbilek.com
My Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
nathaneveraert.com
Nathan Everaert - Game Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
70match
kirasayko.com
Kira's Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
ilyafirsov.com
Ilya Firsov – Game Designer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
alexisarenas.net
Alexis Arenas - Game & Level Designer Portfolio | Alexis Arenas
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
betagd.com
Roberta Alves - Games Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
angelregalado.dev
Angel's Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
pekmoos.com
PATRIK LÓJA | GAME DESIGN PORTFOLIO
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
arranbrocklehurst.com
Arran Brocklehurst | Games Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
andelulu-techart.com
Zhuoyang's Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
anahidattaran.com
Games | Anahid's Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
andreareverberi.com
Andrea Reverberi | Game Designer & Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
pawelpernak.com
Pawel Pernak Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
alanschroeder.com
Alan's Portfolio Site
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
andyyufengwang.com
Andy Wang's Portfolio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
amy-portfolio.com
Amy's Portfolios!
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
69match
chengdaiportfolio.com
Innovative Level Designs and Game Analysis Portfolio | Arcane Level Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
68match
andreibornstein.com
Andrei's Portfolio Site
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.