Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to manuxer.com

manuxer | UX Designer Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
designedbynadia.com
Nadia Hussain, UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
79match
aniketm.com
Aniket - UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
78match
anahi-melendez.com
Anahi's Portfolio | UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
78match
nahidesign.com
Nahid – UI/UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
78match
natashapng.com
Natasha P'ng | UX/UI Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
78match
sirimanna.com
Viraj Sirimanna | Senior UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
77match
annalomidze.com
Anna Lomidze - UI/UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
77match
simonesen.com
Simone | Visual Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
77match
averagejim.me
Jim's Portfolio – Digital Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
77match
designlume.com
Kasturi — Design Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
77match
biarox.com
Beatriz Marques Portfolio | Beatriz Marques | UX Designer Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
77match
manjikari.com
UX Design Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
76match
chinonyechime.com
Chinonye Chime- UI/UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
76match
ilvamikite.com
Creative Designer | UX/UI Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
76match
andersodonoghue.com
Anders O'Donoghue | UX Design Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
76match
gloryangelova.com
Gloria Angelova - UI/UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
76match
kihodesign.com
KihoDesign: UI UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
76match
ashleysanford.com
UX Design Portfolio - Home
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.