Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to manuscriptlink.com

ManuscriptLink - Manuscript Submission & Peer-Review Service · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
50match
hqmpublishing.com
HQM Publishing | Sharing Written Treasures
3 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorypublishing-industry
45match
adhtranslation.com
ADH Translation
2 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorypublishing-industry
43match
myebook.com
Myebook - get it out there!
2 co-citations3 shared tech1 shared categorypublishing-industry
42match
dailyumbrella.com
The Daily Umbrella
2 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorypublishing-industry
42match
biblimat.com
Biblimat - Home
2 co-citations5 shared tech1 shared categorypublishing-industry
42match
amazonspublishing.com
Book Writing Services | Professional Book Writers For Hire
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorypublishing-industry
41match
ithenticate.com
Publish with confidence | iThenticate
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorypublishing-industry
41match
andreasmarkessinis.com
Andreas Markessinis
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorypublishing-industry
41match
academiasolution.com
Best Transcription & Editing Service | Academia Solutions
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorypublishing-industry
41match
heymans-vanhove.be 🇧🇪
Heymans & Vanhove
2 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorypublishing-industry
40match
biblioyou.com
BiblioYou Personal Publishing Platform
3 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categorypublishing-industry
40match
elitebookdistributor.com
Elite Book Distributor | Best Global Publishing & Distribution
1 co-citations4 shared tech1 shared categorypublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.