Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to mangoeric.dev

JongYoung Ko — read_profile() · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
patjacobs.com
Pat Jacobs
3 shared topicsweb-development
67match
derrickgee.dev
Home
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
denizaygun.com
Home | Deniz Aygun
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
derekndavis.com
Derek N. Davis
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
chardoncs.com
Charles' independent space
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
chardon55.com
Charles' independent space
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
aayushksharma.com
Yush — Software Engineer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
alexanderfletcher.dev
Alex's Blog
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
kieferwaight.com
Kiefer Waight
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
denis-iakimenko.com
Denis Iakimenko — Fullstack TypeScript Developer & Tech Notes
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
cherniavskii.com
Home | cherniavskii.com
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
tgreenidge.com
Portfolio - Tisha Greenidge
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
naman-anand.com
Naman Anand | Senior Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
restpen.com
Restpen - Developer's Pool
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ilya-chumakov.com
Ilya Chumakov's Dev Blog
3 shared topicsweb-development
64match
4li.io
Ali Dehkharqani — Go Backend Software Engineer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
0xjcf.com
Jose Flores | Statecharts & Actor Model in TypeScript | Writing & Open Source
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
dericbunch.com
Deric Bunch - Profile Website
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.