Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to mandiosborne.com

Mandi Osborne · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
71match
jamiifidler.com
Jamii Fidler
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
68match
jgprewette.com
J.G. Prewette
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
65match
majortenacity.com
Marcus Akeem Johnson
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
64match
elisabethaimeebrown.com
Elisabeth Aimee Brown
2 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
63match
elimerina.com
Eli Merina
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
62match
kjrust.com
K.J. Rust
2 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
62match
jan-graham.com
Jan Graham
2 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
62match
jellerossbooks.com
J. Elle Ross
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
62match
apaigeturnerbooks.com
A. Paige Turner
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
62match
cegideon.com
C.E. Gideon
2 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
62match
eliashauthor.com
Eli Ash/Kathkeen Kerr
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
62match
marekpuchon.com
Marek Puchon
3 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
61match
juliasereynne.com
Julia Sereynne
3 co-citations8 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction
60match
jamieryderbooks.com
Jamie Ryder
2 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
60match
janedwardsauthor.com
Jan Edwards
2 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
60match
admatsonstories.com
A.D. Matson
2 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction
59match
juliefugate.com
Julie Fugate
2 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categorybooks-and-literature
59match
janetcarsonauthor.com
Janet Carson
2 co-citations8 shared tech2 shared categoryfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.